A growing controversy surrounds the BBC after revelations that one of its programmes edited a speech by President Donald Trump in a misleading way. The public and several political figures are calling this incident a serious breach of journalistic ethics and trust.
"This scandal should force the Government to scrap the exploitative licence fee once and for all."
According to a leaked internal memo obtained by The Telegraph, the BBC’s Panorama programme manipulated footage of President Trump’s speech. The report claims that editors combined separate phrases, added ominous background music, and mixed them with scenes from the Capitol riots—recorded before Trump even delivered the address.
This editing allegedly made it appear that President Trump urged his supporters toward violence, an interpretation that critics argue was entirely fabricated.
"What we learned today is devastating for the BBC’s reputation at home and abroad."
Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg described the matter as a catastrophic blow to the broadcaster’s credibility. He compared it unfavourably to previous scandals, suggesting it was even worse than the infamous Martin Bashir interview with Diana, Princess of Wales.
"This is shameful. It is worse than any editorial legerdemain we have seen in the past."
Rees-Mogg emphasized that while Princess Diana had at least consented to her interview, Trump was falsely depicted using words he never spoke.
The scandal has renewed debate about the broadcaster’s funding and independence, with some lawmakers demanding the abolition of the licence fee. Questions about internal accountability, editorial oversight, and public trust continue to mount.
Author’s summary: Allegations of BBC editing President Trump’s speech have sparked outrage, prompting calls for reform and challenging the broadcaster’s integrity both domestically and abroad.